Tools & Wizards About Us
screenfood.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

screenfood.com

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

386 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

710 ms

screenfood.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to screenfood.com homepage info - get ready to check Screenfood best content right away, or after learning these important things about screenfood.com

screenFOODnet is a full-service provider for digital signage and communication solutions in future retail.

Visit screenfood.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenfood.com page load time and found that the first response time was 386 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenfood.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.288

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenfood.com

386 ms

914 ms

gtm.js

59 ms

lago_slider.jpg

1472 ms

logo-white.f9d2ecaa7531.svg

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Screenfood.com, 36% (20 requests) were made to Screenfoodnet.com and 32% (18 requests) were made to Screenfood-0bd862b.sos-ch-dk-2.exo.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Screenfood-0bd862b.sos-ch-dk-2.exo.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 294.6 kB (3%)

Content Size

9.0 MB

After Optimization

8.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenfood.com main page is 9.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 82.4 kB

  • Original 94.9 kB
  • After minification 75.6 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.3 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 211.6 kB

  • Original 8.8 MB
  • After minification 8.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenfood images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 327 B

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 70.3 kB
  • After compression 69.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 268 B

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 36.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenfood.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (26%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenfood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenfood.com

screenfood.com

386 ms

914 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

59 ms

lago_slider.jpg

lago_slider.jpg

1472 ms

logo-white.f9d2ecaa7531.svg

logo-white.f9d2ecaa7531.svg

106 ms

fastaxs_iso_whiteline_part1and2.png

fastaxs_iso_whiteline_part1and2.png

1330 ms

mobiliar_home.jpg

mobiliar_home.jpg

1502 ms

base.303ef864b110.css

base.303ef864b110.css

212 ms

base.8724e37a7dee.css

base.8724e37a7dee.css

320 ms

base.9dcd494c6848.css

base.9dcd494c6848.css

420 ms

promise.min.f2f19670033d.js

promise.min.f2f19670033d.js

318 ms

system.e4da8155328f.js

system.e4da8155328f.js

478 ms

wet2aex.js

wet2aex.js

123 ms

facebook-white.b6572f27cbe7.svg

facebook-white.b6572f27cbe7.svg

318 ms

youtube-white.ef1afac6b610.svg

youtube-white.ef1afac6b610.svg

476 ms

linkedIn-logo-white.c8890209eae5.svg

linkedIn-logo-white.c8890209eae5.svg

477 ms

header_flat_lowres.jpg

header_flat_lowres.jpg

1813 ms

upc_shop_home_slider_3.jpg

upc_shop_home_slider_3.jpg

1607 ms

screenfoonet_logo_nob.svg

screenfoonet_logo_nob.svg

990 ms

slider-green.86699dc2d770.svg

slider-green.86699dc2d770.svg

298 ms

footer.83165a8ae0d3.svg

footer.83165a8ae0d3.svg

299 ms

referenz-icons_migros.jpg__1800x600_q100_crop.jpg

referenz-icons_migros.jpg__1800x600_q100_crop.jpg

687 ms

klubschule-migros-luzern_bild1.jpg

klubschule-migros-luzern_bild1.jpg

1333 ms

software_all.jpg

software_all.jpg

1123 ms

lago_shopping-center_konstanz_teaser.jpg

lago_shopping-center_konstanz_teaser.jpg

1189 ms

teaser_kopie.jpg

teaser_kopie.jpg

1319 ms

upc_shop_ss_teaser_small.jpg

upc_shop_ss_teaser_small.jpg

1348 ms

mobiliar__teaser.jpg

mobiliar__teaser.jpg

1317 ms

denner-tabak-web.jpg

denner-tabak-web.jpg

1375 ms

content-teaser_web.jpg

content-teaser_web.jpg

1470 ms

team-teaser.jpg

team-teaser.jpg

1444 ms

fontawesome-webfont.f84ffa8dd970.woff

fontawesome-webfont.f84ffa8dd970.woff

368 ms

jquery.min.32015dd42e95.js

jquery.min.32015dd42e95.js

254 ms

multi_item_carousel.f027015ce774.js

multi_item_carousel.f027015ce774.js

273 ms

ScrollMagic.min.174bd048999b.js

ScrollMagic.min.174bd048999b.js

131 ms

bootstrap.min.4becdc910462.js

bootstrap.min.4becdc910462.js

133 ms

rsp.min.2ebca8a67438.js

rsp.min.2ebca8a67438.js

137 ms

getcookie.min.c79fb88c0753.js

getcookie.min.c79fb88c0753.js

129 ms

d

d

32 ms

d

d

37 ms

d

d

37 ms

d

d

38 ms

d

d

38 ms

d

d

38 ms

d

d

65 ms

d

d

65 ms

d

d

63 ms

d

d

63 ms

d

d

63 ms

d

d

65 ms

d

d

64 ms

d

d

65 ms

jquery.bcSwipe.min.e804e3e9ce59.js

jquery.bcSwipe.min.e804e3e9ce59.js

109 ms

p.gif

p.gif

38 ms

referenz-icons_mobi24.jpg__1800x600_q100_crop.jpg

referenz-icons_mobi24.jpg__1800x600_q100_crop.jpg

140 ms

helsana_referenz.jpg__1800x600_q100_crop.jpg

helsana_referenz.jpg__1800x600_q100_crop.jpg

126 ms

Accessibility Review

screenfood.com accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

screenfood.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

screenfood.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenfood.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenfood.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenfood.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenfood. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: