Tools & Wizards About Us
silvergrey.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

silvergrey.in

Silvergrey

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

445 ms

silvergrey.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Silvergrey content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about silvergrey.in

Visit silvergrey.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Silvergrey.in page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

silvergrey.in performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

silvergrey.in

294 ms

css2

33 ms

aos.css

170 ms

bootstrap.min.css

268 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Silvergrey.in, 19% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Silvergrey.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.1 kB (42%)

Content Size

245.8 kB

After Optimization

142.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Silvergrey.in main page is 245.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 102.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 47.6 kB

  • Original 56.3 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.8 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 16.1 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Silvergrey needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 102.6 kB
  • After minification 102.6 kB
  • After compression 72.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 70.8 kB
  • After minification 70.8 kB
  • After compression 50.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silvergrey.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (27%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silvergrey. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

silvergrey.in

silvergrey.in

294 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

aos.css

aos.css

170 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

268 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

181 ms

slick.css

slick.css

185 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

185 ms

style.css

style.css

170 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

256 ms

aos.js

aos.js

319 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

362 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

361 ms

slick.js

slick.js

322 ms

main.js

main.js

383 ms

silvergrey.png

silvergrey.png

383 ms

slide1.webp

slide1.webp

603 ms

slide2.webp

slide2.webp

689 ms

slide3.webp

slide3.webp

564 ms

slide4.webp

slide4.webp

621 ms

slide5.webp

slide5.webp

667 ms

etihad.webp

etihad.webp

629 ms

adani.webp

adani.webp

783 ms

walmart.webp

walmart.webp

794 ms

pepsico.webp

pepsico.webp

778 ms

ibm.webp

ibm.webp

838 ms

jio.webp

jio.webp

787 ms

cisco.webp

cisco.webp

855 ms

ui-ux.webp

ui-ux.webp

949 ms

android.webp

android.webp

948 ms

ios-development.webp

ios-development.webp

974 ms

big-graph.webp

big-graph.webp

1034 ms

research-slide.webp

research-slide.webp

1006 ms

atentive.webp

atentive.webp

970 ms

lottie.webp

lottie.webp

1044 ms

discoard.webp

discoard.webp

1060 ms

cinchoor.webp

cinchoor.webp

1141 ms

gumroad.webp

gumroad.webp

1137 ms

goods.webp

goods.webp

1115 ms

juillet.webp

juillet.webp

997 ms

ramp.webp

ramp.webp

1017 ms

card-im.webp

card-im.webp

999 ms

home-banner.webp

home-banner.webp

954 ms

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj7oUUsj.ttf

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj7oUUsj.ttf

18 ms

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj7aUUsj.ttf

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj7aUUsj.ttf

27 ms

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj62UUsj.ttf

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj62UUsj.ttf

64 ms

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj42Vksj.ttf

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj42Vksj.ttf

59 ms

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj4PVksj.ttf

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj4PVksj.ttf

60 ms

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_3fvj6k.ttf

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_3fvj6k.ttf

59 ms

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_24vj6k.ttf

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_24vj6k.ttf

61 ms

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_3mvj6k.ttf

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_3mvj6k.ttf

60 ms

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_0KuT6k.ttf

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_0KuT6k.ttf

58 ms

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_04uT6k.ttf

8vIS7w4qzmVxsWxjBZRjr0FKM_04uT6k.ttf

60 ms

Accessibility Review

silvergrey.in accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

silvergrey.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

silvergrey.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silvergrey.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silvergrey.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

silvergrey.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Silvergrey. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: