Tools & Wizards About Us
sleightconservation.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

sleightconservation.co.uk

Conservation Specialist repair listed buildings. - David Sleight Conservation

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

901 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

582 ms

sleightconservation.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sleight Conservation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sleightconservation.co.uk

Conservation Specialist. Lime mortars, Damp, Ash floors, Cob wall repairs, Lime plastering, consultancy historic building. Northamptonshire Leicestershire.

Visit sleightconservation.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Sleightconservation.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 901 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sleightconservation.co.uk performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.112

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sleightconservation.co.uk

901 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

style.min.css

161 ms

child-theme-generator-public.css

159 ms

styles.css

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Sleightconservation.co.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (901 ms) belongs to the original domain Sleightconservation.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

663.1 kB

After Optimization

609.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sleightconservation.co.uk main page is 663.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 381.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 39.6 kB

  • Original 49.5 kB
  • After minification 47.3 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 381.5 kB
  • After minification 374.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sleight Conservation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 160.6 kB
  • After minification 160.2 kB
  • After compression 158.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 71.5 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 66.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sleightconservation.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (83%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sleight Conservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sleightconservation.co.uk

www.sleightconservation.co.uk

901 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

161 ms

child-theme-generator-public.css

child-theme-generator-public.css

159 ms

styles.css

styles.css

164 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

165 ms

crellyslider.min.css

crellyslider.min.css

165 ms

foobox.free.min.css

foobox.free.min.css

166 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

237 ms

all.css

all.css

248 ms

header-style.css

header-style.css

244 ms

footer-default.css

footer-default.css

243 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

244 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

251 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

328 ms

post-21.css

post-21.css

325 ms

post-32.css

post-32.css

326 ms

css

css

33 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

438 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

341 ms

child-theme-generator-public.js

child-theme-generator-public.js

342 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

408 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

411 ms

jquery.crellyslider.min.js

jquery.crellyslider.min.js

417 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

435 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

432 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

488 ms

custom.js

custom.js

508 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

509 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

511 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

519 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

517 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

566 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

653 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

577 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

589 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

597 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

598 ms

bg.png

bg.png

179 ms

news_1.jpg

news_1.jpg

213 ms

news_2.jpg

news_2.jpg

284 ms

news_3.jpg

news_3.jpg

214 ms

news_4.jpg

news_4.jpg

216 ms

font

font

42 ms

font

font

47 ms

font

font

90 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

469 ms

menu-mobile.css

menu-mobile.css

79 ms

responsive-tablet.css

responsive-tablet.css

80 ms

responsive-mobile.css

responsive-mobile.css

80 ms

Accessibility Review

sleightconservation.co.uk accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

sleightconservation.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sleightconservation.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sleightconservation.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sleightconservation.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sleightconservation.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sleight Conservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: