2.1 sec in total
313 ms
1.3 sec
483 ms
Visit smspack.net now to see the best up-to-date SMSPack content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about smspack.net
We offer Bulk SMS Pack Service in India with Web base access, Excel Plugins and API Connectivity for software developers. | SMSPack.net
Visit smspack.netWe analyzed Smspack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 313 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
smspack.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.146
77/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
313 ms
161 ms
162 ms
178 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Smspack.net, 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) belongs to the original domain Smspack.net.
Page size can be reduced by 144.7 kB (22%)
646.7 kB
502.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Smspack.net main page is 646.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 436.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SMSPack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 69.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.4 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smspack.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (34%)
35
23
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SMSPack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
smspack.net
313 ms
menu.css
161 ms
superfish.css
162 ms
style.css
178 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
9 ms
bjqs-1.3.min.js
198 ms
bjqs.css
167 ms
adsbygoogle.js
27 ms
jqury.min.js
292 ms
superfish.js
399 ms
bg_header.png
191 ms
slogan.png
244 ms
logo.png
190 ms
btn_login.png
190 ms
nav_bg.png
253 ms
hero_bg.jpg
335 ms
9.jpg
475 ms
5.jpg
491 ms
4.jpg
335 ms
6.jpg
375 ms
7.jpg
365 ms
sign_up_top.png
490 ms
1.jpg
433 ms
divider_bg.png
458 ms
go_top.png
513 ms
ca-pub-9140534023554591.js
216 ms
zrt_lookup.html
218 ms
show_ads_impl.js
73 ms
ads
350 ms
osd.js
71 ms
m_js_controller.js
80 ms
abg.js
97 ms
favicon
91 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
79 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
73 ms
s
47 ms
x_button_blue2.png
9 ms
smspack.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
smspack.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
smspack.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smspack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Smspack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
smspack.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SMSPack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: