5.5 sec in total
89 ms
4.6 sec
822 ms
Click here to check amazing Starling Co content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about starlingco.com
Starling & Company protects successful families and businesses throughout the US with high net worth insurance and risk management solutions.
Visit starlingco.comWe analyzed Starlingco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
starlingco.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value24.7 s
0/100
25%
Value46.4 s
0/100
10%
Value32,050 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value46.2 s
0/100
10%
89 ms
1971 ms
118 ms
176 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Starlingco.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Starlingco.com.
Page size can be reduced by 717.7 kB (61%)
1.2 MB
451.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Starlingco.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 712.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 190.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 190.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starling Co images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 498.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starlingco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 498.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (90%)
62
6
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starling Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
starlingco.com
89 ms
starlingco.com
1971 ms
fbevents.js
118 ms
js
176 ms
forge3-activeagency-styles.css
32 ms
style.min.css
54 ms
iconsmind-core.css
114 ms
dashicons.min.css
106 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
73 ms
style.css
105 ms
grid-system.css
68 ms
style.css
78 ms
header-secondary-nav.css
132 ms
element-fancy-box.css
154 ms
element-toggles.css
131 ms
element-interactive-map.css
145 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
149 ms
responsive.css
132 ms
skin-original.css
147 ms
menu-dynamic.css
141 ms
js_composer.min.css
141 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
165 ms
style.css
152 ms
jquery.min.js
153 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
376 ms
forge3-activeagency-header-scripts.js
150 ms
jquery.json.min.js
152 ms
gravityforms.min.js
357 ms
css
359 ms
arrows_styles.css
297 ms
element-animated-title.css
297 ms
iconsmind.css
298 ms
core.css
300 ms
nectar-testimonial-slider.js
301 ms
forge3-activeagency-footer-scripts.js
298 ms
jquery.easing.js
299 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
378 ms
priority.js
353 ms
transit.js
368 ms
waypoints.js
352 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
362 ms
hoverintent.js
354 ms
superfish.js
329 ms
init.js
320 ms
touchswipe.min.js
294 ms
comment-reply.min.js
289 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
289 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
291 ms
dom-ready.min.js
268 ms
hooks.min.js
264 ms
i18n.min.js
260 ms
a11y.min.js
262 ms
pixel-cat.min.js
254 ms
video.js
252 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
250 ms
akismet-frontend.js
250 ms
anime.js
245 ms
map.js
239 ms
lazyload.min.js
238 ms
analytics.js
186 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtrhnIGiV2g.ttf
854 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGiV2g.ttf
854 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
713 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
712 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
711 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
716 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
714 ms
icomoon.woff
37 ms
iconsmind.ttf
717 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
711 ms
collect
490 ms
active-agency.woff
486 ms
Starling-and-Company-Logo-500-White.png
197 ms
Starling-and-Company-Logo-500.png
197 ms
linea-arrows-10.woff
103 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
33 ms
starlingco.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
starlingco.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
starlingco.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starlingco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starlingco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
starlingco.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starling Co. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: