3.9 sec in total
756 ms
3 sec
168 ms
Click here to check amazing Stonell content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonell.com
UK supplier and retailer of stone bathroom furniture and natural stone flooring and wall tiles in limestone, marble, travertine tile, slate, basalt, granite and sandstone and mosaics.
Visit stonell.comWe analyzed Stonell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 756 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
stonell.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value3.4 s
65/100
25%
Value4.4 s
75/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.643
9/100
15%
Value5.0 s
77/100
10%
756 ms
188 ms
192 ms
197 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Stonell.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Stonell.com.
Page size can be reduced by 187.1 kB (29%)
652.3 kB
465.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Stonell.com main page is 652.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 405.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonell images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonell.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (55%)
56
25
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stonell.com
756 ms
node.css
188 ms
defaults.css
192 ms
system.css
197 ms
system-menus.css
194 ms
user.css
195 ms
content-module.css
356 ms
filefield.css
372 ms
lightbox.css
369 ms
nice_menus.css
369 ms
nice_menus_default.css
377 ms
slideshow_creator.css
381 ms
fieldgroup.css
455 ms
views.css
473 ms
html-elements.css
468 ms
tabs.css
472 ms
messages.css
474 ms
block-editing.css
478 ms
wireframes.css
633 ms
layout.css
638 ms
stonell.css
852 ms
tiny-mce.css
654 ms
jquery.js
828 ms
drupal.js
662 ms
lightbox.js
1007 ms
superfish.js
815 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
829 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
848 ms
nice_menus.js
1007 ms
slideshow_creator.js
1008 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
1210 ms
spamspan.compressed.js
1038 ms
googleanalytics.js
952 ms
logo.jpg
178 ms
mail-icon.png
185 ms
block-icon.png
183 ms
search-button.png
185 ms
Barn%20Hall.jpg
471 ms
BasaltinaCom890.jpg
392 ms
Brushed%20Limestone%20Conservatory.jpg
529 ms
Capture-028943.jpg
635 ms
DijonHall890.jpg
556 ms
SeguraTerr890.jpg
666 ms
SilvTravWall890.jpg
838 ms
WildBasExt890.jpg
991 ms
head-1.jpg
713 ms
home-stonell-stone-range.jpg
740 ms
home-bespoke-stone.jpg
833 ms
home-bathroom-stone.jpg
854 ms
home-galleries.jpg
888 ms
home-projects.jpg
912 ms
home-stonell-architectural.jpg
1010 ms
home-new-products.jpg
1019 ms
blank.png
1026 ms
link-icon-small.png
1059 ms
ga.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
stonell.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
stonell.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stonell.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonell.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stonell. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: