Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

236 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

602 ms

techwatch.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to techwatch.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Techwatch best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about techwatch.co.uk

Get instant cash for your mobile phone trade-in, even for broken or old devices.

Visit techwatch.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Techwatch.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

techwatch.co.uk performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,210 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.2 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

techwatch.co.uk

236 ms

techwatch.co.uk

322 ms

trade-ins

391 ms

62 ms

gtm.js

105 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Techwatch.co.uk, 88% (36 requests) were made to Thebigphonestore.co.uk and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (537 ms) relates to the external source Thebigphonestore.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 354.6 kB (79%)

Content Size

451.5 kB

After Optimization

96.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Techwatch.co.uk main page is 451.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 422.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 353.6 kB

  • Original 422.8 kB
  • After minification 420.5 kB
  • After compression 69.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 353.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 28.7 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Techwatch images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (84%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Techwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

techwatch.co.uk accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

techwatch.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

techwatch.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techwatch.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Techwatch.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Techwatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: