3.6 sec in total
578 ms
2.6 sec
383 ms
Click here to check amazing Textappeal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about textappeal.com
Textappeal provides creative translation & transcreation services to world leading international brands and their agencies since 1998.
Visit textappeal.comWe analyzed Textappeal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 578 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
textappeal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.122
84/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
578 ms
82 ms
225 ms
259 ms
247 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Textappeal.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Textappeal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 76.7 kB (11%)
683.7 kB
606.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Textappeal.com main page is 683.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 249.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Textappeal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textappeal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (71%)
58
17
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textappeal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textappeal.com
578 ms
css
82 ms
ctt-module-design.css
225 ms
frontend.css
259 ms
responsive.css
247 ms
styles.css
252 ms
testimonial-rotator-style.css
263 ms
font-awesome.min.css
248 ms
style.css
248 ms
font-awesome.min.css
311 ms
stylesheet.min.css
388 ms
style_dynamic.php
457 ms
responsive.min.css
323 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
431 ms
js_composer.min.css
553 ms
custom_css.php
538 ms
form-themes.min.css
414 ms
jquery.js
541 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
483 ms
jquery.cycletwo.js
502 ms
jquery.cycletwo.addons.js
534 ms
ctt-script.js
930 ms
frontend-min.js
931 ms
scripts.js
932 ms
qode-like.js
931 ms
plugins.js
1060 ms
js
270 ms
default_dynamic.php
939 ms
default.min.js
935 ms
custom_js.php
937 ms
comment-reply.min.js
930 ms
ajax.min.js
931 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
897 ms
wp-embed.min.js
897 ms
forms-api.min.js
899 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
731 ms
css
69 ms
css
82 ms
css
86 ms
css
84 ms
css
87 ms
css
89 ms
css
87 ms
TA-Logo-png.png
144 ms
TA-Logo-RGB_webnav-231x300.jpg
141 ms
costa-testi1.png
145 ms
jum.png
143 ms
london.png
144 ms
sony-test.png
189 ms
nikon_logo_TA.jpg
190 ms
Textappeal-logo-2016_Strapline.png
572 ms
ga.js
24 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
Textappealimage222lr.jpg
433 ms
Textappealimage2lr.jpg
433 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
422 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
42 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
511 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
254 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
512 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
256 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
513 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
512 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
255 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
510 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
572 ms
u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7ilwg.ttf
256 ms
u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7ilwg.ttf
256 ms
collect
504 ms
gen_204
220 ms
Text_appeal_banner2.jpg
553 ms
social_share_purple.png
166 ms
logo.png
168 ms
textappeal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
textappeal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
textappeal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textappeal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textappeal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textappeal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Textappeal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: