Tools & Wizards About Us
tillt.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

tillt.in

Laparoscopic Training Centre in India | Surgery Course

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

495 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

tillt.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tillt content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tillt.in

Looking for best Laparoscopic Training Centre in India? TILLT is best institute for laparoscopic colorectal, cbd exploration course & surgery.

Visit tillt.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Tillt.in page load time and found that the first response time was 495 ms and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tillt.in performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,980 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.377

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tillt.in

495 ms

tillt.in

1092 ms

wpo-minify-header-23054c2b.min.css

421 ms

wpo-minify-header-6abceb49.min.css

1189 ms

wpo-minify-header-7b130e3d.min.js

1026 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Tillt.in, 55% (39 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 323.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tillt.in main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 178.6 kB

  • Original 213.0 kB
  • After minification 204.4 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8 B

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tillt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 92.6 kB

  • Original 328.8 kB
  • After minification 328.8 kB
  • After compression 236.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.6 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 52.5 kB

  • Original 174.7 kB
  • After minification 174.7 kB
  • After compression 122.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tillt.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (27%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tillt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tillt.in

tillt.in

495 ms

tillt.in

tillt.in

1092 ms

wpo-minify-header-23054c2b.min.css

wpo-minify-header-23054c2b.min.css

421 ms

wpo-minify-header-6abceb49.min.css

wpo-minify-header-6abceb49.min.css

1189 ms

wpo-minify-header-7b130e3d.min.js

wpo-minify-header-7b130e3d.min.js

1026 ms

wpo-minify-header-b3313206.min.js

wpo-minify-header-b3313206.min.js

619 ms

s-202448.js

s-202448.js

17 ms

js

js

66 ms

wpo-minify-footer-cf7d1e02.min.css

wpo-minify-footer-cf7d1e02.min.css

630 ms

wpo-minify-footer-e6e81059.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-e6e81059.min.js

629 ms

wpo-minify-footer-e29d2a39.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-e29d2a39.min.js

864 ms

e-202448.js

e-202448.js

16 ms

wpo-minify-footer-caa42029.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-caa42029.min.js

1034 ms

wpo-minify-footer-e1352d64.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-e1352d64.min.js

854 ms

wpo-minify-footer-fc0a1534.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-fc0a1534.min.js

1082 ms

IAO-Strip.jpg

IAO-Strip.jpg

1002 ms

embed

embed

327 ms

cropped-cropped-Strip-4-1.jpg

cropped-cropped-Strip-4-1.jpg

292 ms

RETROPERITONEAL-Strip-2.jpg

RETROPERITONEAL-Strip-2.jpg

1190 ms

Diploma-Program-strip.jpg

Diploma-Program-strip.jpg

1237 ms

Website-Pages-2-scaled.jpg

Website-Pages-2-scaled.jpg

133 ms

Website-Pages-4-scaled.jpg

Website-Pages-4-scaled.jpg

1233 ms

Website-Pages-1-scaled.jpg

Website-Pages-1-scaled.jpg

134 ms

Website-Pages-3-scaled.jpg

Website-Pages-3-scaled.jpg

154 ms

Website-Pages-13-1.jpg

Website-Pages-13-1.jpg

154 ms

228X200.jpg

228X200.jpg

1006 ms

Importance-of-Annual-Gynaecology-Screening-for-Womens-Health.jpg

Importance-of-Annual-Gynaecology-Screening-for-Womens-Health.jpg

179 ms

Medical-Practice.webp

Medical-Practice.webp

202 ms

Considering-Minimally-Invasive-Gynecologic-Surgery.jpg

Considering-Minimally-Invasive-Gynecologic-Surgery.jpg

219 ms

Orthopedic-Surgery.jpg

Orthopedic-Surgery.jpg

253 ms

dr-anurag-arora-2-1.jpg

dr-anurag-arora-2-1.jpg

888 ms

dr-anuapama-sethi-1-1.jpg

dr-anuapama-sethi-1-1.jpg

1579 ms

dr-pragnesh-2.jpg

dr-pragnesh-2.jpg

1887 ms

Dr.-Ashish-sehgal-2.jpg

Dr.-Ashish-sehgal-2.jpg

1637 ms

Dr.-Alka-Sinha.jpg

Dr.-Alka-Sinha.jpg

1844 ms

Dr.-Arun-Kalpdev.jpg

Dr.-Arun-Kalpdev.jpg

1905 ms

Dr-Hemant.jpg

Dr-Hemant.jpg

1880 ms

Dr.-Kapil-Lal.jpg

Dr.-Kapil-Lal.jpg

2222 ms

surgery.jpg

surgery.jpg

1639 ms

2560x1707px-1-1.jpg

2560x1707px-1-1.jpg

1642 ms

2560x1707px-2.jpg

2560x1707px-2.jpg

1645 ms

39.jpg

39.jpg

2495 ms

38.jpg

38.jpg

2689 ms

37.jpg

37.jpg

2734 ms

24.jpg

24.jpg

2743 ms

22.jpg

22.jpg

2751 ms

18.jpg

18.jpg

3047 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

3384 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

3530 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

2735 ms

PHOTO-2024-01-17-17-26-04.jpg

PHOTO-2024-01-17-17-26-04.jpg

2737 ms

surgery11-q8numz29gayp6qzy327adwijazjnsnronh9hmo23uo.jpeg

surgery11-q8numz29gayp6qzy327adwijazjnsnronh9hmo23uo.jpeg

2760 ms

logo-2-2-1.png

logo-2-2-1.png

2882 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9TR_TMq2oRsWk.woff

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9TR_TMq2oRsWk.woff

72 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9Qx_TMq2oRsWk0Fs.woff

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9Qx_TMq2oRsWk0Fs.woff

90 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9Qh_TMq2oRsWk0Fs.woff

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9Qh_TMq2oRsWk0Fs.woff

114 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9QB_TMq2oRsWk0Fs.woff

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9QB_TMq2oRsWk0Fs.woff

114 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

643 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

410 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

921 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

512 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

896 ms

Medafia-Logo.jpg

Medafia-Logo.jpg

2628 ms

iao-seal.png

iao-seal.png

2704 ms

RETROPERITONEAL-Strip-2-1.jpg

RETROPERITONEAL-Strip-2-1.jpg

2654 ms

js

js

40 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

4 ms

search.js

search.js

8 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

wpo-minify-header-ee9c1411.min.css

wpo-minify-header-ee9c1411.min.css

207 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

21 ms

Accessibility Review

tillt.in accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

tillt.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tillt.in SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tillt.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tillt.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tillt.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tillt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: