2.2 sec in total
197 ms
1.9 sec
151 ms
Click here to check amazing Tuneup 2012 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tuneup2012.com
琼中悄曰会展服务有限公司
Visit tuneup2012.comWe analyzed Tuneup2012.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
tuneup2012.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
88/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
197 ms
780 ms
553 ms
69 ms
262 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tuneup2012.com, 66% (39 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 17% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (780 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 357.9 kB (62%)
577.9 kB
220.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Tuneup2012.com main page is 577.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 464.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tuneup 2012 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 333.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 333.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (69%)
45
14
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tuneup 2012. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tuneup2012.com
197 ms
tuneup2012.com
780 ms
master.css
553 ms
css
69 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
262 ms
customInput.jquery.js
190 ms
jquery.color.js
195 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
322 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.custom.min.js
513 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
253 ms
common_an.js
323 ms
ajax_an.js
384 ms
ajax.js
325 ms
ICanHaz.min.js
397 ms
plugins.js
349 ms
script.js
350 ms
form2js.js
396 ms
jquery.toObject.js
412 ms
track.js
415 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
shadow-bodyfold.png
88 ms
afternic.png
200 ms
shadow-header.png
78 ms
sprites-home.png
198 ms
button-subnav-bg-biggreen.png
79 ms
bg-subnav-15per-grey.png
78 ms
icon-subnav-agent-green.png
77 ms
button-subnav-bg-bigblue.png
126 ms
bg-subnav-divider.png
120 ms
icon-appraisal-large.png
157 ms
button-bg-green.png
156 ms
bg-banner-green.png
156 ms
button-bg-medblue.png
183 ms
shadow-mainsearch-input.png
193 ms
icons-social-content.png
229 ms
blue-seal-96-50-godaddycomllc-22000169.png
55 ms
seal
54 ms
collect
27 ms
shadow-subfooter.png
156 ms
bg-footer-stats.png
155 ms
bg-footer-decoration.png
160 ms
bg-footer.png
186 ms
bg-footer-about.png
188 ms
shadow-footer-badges.png
220 ms
site-stats.tpl.html
210 ms
elqCfg.min.js
25 ms
61V2bQZoWB5DkWAUJStypevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
34 ms
2HG_tEPiQ4Z6795cGfdivCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
51 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYECZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
66 ms
VNUH7ZAcagYBWsAiBBCEYyZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
59 ms
1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
66 ms
0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
71 ms
MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
66 ms
jZjuDZSb58pQtWhOr6q-6ALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
83 ms
-KTKVm0Mx9ZCRXL9CXVIbSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
70 ms
I27Pb-wEGH2ajLYP0QrtSJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
70 ms
svrGP
158 ms
afternic.png
103 ms
svrGP.aspx
46 ms
tuneup2012.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tuneup2012.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
tuneup2012.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
ZH
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuneup2012.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Tuneup2012.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tuneup2012.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tuneup 2012. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: