3 sec in total
55 ms
2.7 sec
260 ms
Click here to check amazing Tutorial FAQ content for Uganda. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tutorialfaq.com
Frequently Asked Questions about Technology Tutorials. Check out the pool of the best tutorials to spark off your blogging journey
Visit tutorialfaq.comWe analyzed Tutorialfaq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
tutorialfaq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
55 ms
1255 ms
40 ms
320 ms
245 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Tutorialfaq.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Tutorialfaq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 98.3 kB (26%)
372.8 kB
274.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Tutorialfaq.com main page is 372.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 143.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tutorial FAQ images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tutorialfaq.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)
32
16
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tutorial FAQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tutorialfaq.com
55 ms
tutorialfaq.com
1255 ms
font-awesome.min.css
40 ms
font-awesome.min
320 ms
6a596.css
245 ms
css
46 ms
82529.css
215 ms
a5ff7.css
282 ms
f8d0f.css
236 ms
wpp.min.js
223 ms
c1060.css
446 ms
style.min.js
444 ms
index.js
443 ms
index.js
444 ms
public.js
514 ms
forms.js
493 ms
jquery.min.js
631 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
602 ms
socialsnap.js
604 ms
analytics.js
112 ms
looooo-250x52.png
286 ms
computer.png
422 ms
keyboard-498396_640-400x160.jpg
445 ms
od-400x160.jpg
459 ms
what-is-wordpress-hosting--400x160.jpg
553 ms
Make-Money-400x160.jpg
528 ms
cheapwebhosting-400x160.jpg
530 ms
BANNED-FROM-ADSENSE-1-400x160.jpg
652 ms
website-traffic-400x160.jpg
717 ms
webhosts-400x160.jpg
671 ms
twitter-1629809_640-400x160.jpg
748 ms
CHANGE-400x160.jpg
747 ms
instagram-2166645_640-400x160.jpg
803 ms
Ycm2sZJORluHnXbIfmlR-A.ttf
62 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
17 ms
Socicon.woff
951 ms
collect
51 ms
js
64 ms
tutorialfaq.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
tutorialfaq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
tutorialfaq.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tutorialfaq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tutorialfaq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tutorialfaq.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tutorial FAQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: