2.2 sec in total
114 ms
1.6 sec
500 ms
Welcome to ubiqare.in homepage info - get ready to check Ubiqare best content right away, or after learning these important things about ubiqare.in
We provide home health care services in Bangalore for palliative care and hospice care. We combine telemedicine with home health care services in Bangalore.
Visit ubiqare.inWe analyzed Ubiqare.in page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ubiqare.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value15.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value3,010 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
114 ms
111 ms
18 ms
129 ms
407 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Ubiqare.in, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (568 ms) belongs to the original domain Ubiqare.in.
Page size can be reduced by 120.5 kB (3%)
4.4 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ubiqare.in main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ubiqare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ubiqare.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (63%)
81
30
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ubiqare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ubiqare.in
114 ms
ubiqare.in
111 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
styles.css
129 ms
bootstrap.css
407 ms
gui.css
137 ms
font-awesome.css
125 ms
flaticon.css
140 ms
animate.css
33 ms
owl.css
45 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
66 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
77 ms
style.css
89 ms
custom.css
100 ms
responsive.css
111 ms
css
49 ms
pum-site-styles.css
124 ms
kingcomposer.min.css
495 ms
animate.css
136 ms
icons.css
231 ms
smartslider.min.css
244 ms
css
61 ms
js
80 ms
jquery.min.js
151 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
251 ms
js
78 ms
n2.min.js
163 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
175 ms
ss-simple.min.js
191 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
203 ms
email-decode.min.js
204 ms
index.js
218 ms
index.js
236 ms
core.min.js
341 ms
bootstrap.min.js
247 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
397 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
257 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
352 ms
owl.js
267 ms
jquery.appear.js
279 ms
wow.js
289 ms
api.js
51 ms
isotope.js
308 ms
script.js
307 ms
comment-reply.min.js
305 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
306 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
412 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
282 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
378 ms
index.js
276 ms
kingcomposer.min.js
283 ms
css
15 ms
Logo-ff-e1601312807309.png
80 ms
2741-scaled.jpg
295 ms
Banner_2.jpg
82 ms
Banner_1.jpg
448 ms
brain-3168269_1920.png
506 ms
virus-4835301_1920.jpg
445 ms
imgdada.jpg
84 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-3-299x300.jpg
82 ms
3.jpg
295 ms
bright-cardiac-cardiology-433267-380x300.jpg
84 ms
care-caregiver-deal-45842-380x300.jpg
85 ms
dependent-441408_1280-1-380x300.jpg
86 ms
care-connection-device-1282308-380x300.jpg
113 ms
business-strategy-success-target-goals-1-scaled.jpg
115 ms
10000-start-ups-150x150.jpg
116 ms
CCAMP-1-150x150.jpg
292 ms
HTIC-Logos-V2-1-150x150.jpg
390 ms
k-sap-logo-150x150.jpg
391 ms
since-logo-150x150.jpg
390 ms
SocialAlphaLogo-1-150x150.jpg
446 ms
logo_image-high-e1600944548512.png
507 ms
js
289 ms
analytics.js
314 ms
font
395 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
398 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
568 ms
font
365 ms
font
339 ms
flaticon.svg
484 ms
flaticon.woff
482 ms
recaptcha__en.js
252 ms
submenu-icon.png
484 ms
font
201 ms
collect
62 ms
ubiqare.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ubiqare.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ubiqare.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ubiqare.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ubiqare.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ubiqare.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ubiqare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: