Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

uro.ru

Оборудование для урологии для практикующих урологов. Урологические расходные материалы

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

483 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

502 ms

uro.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit uro.ru now to see the best up-to-date Uro content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about uro.ru

Оборудование для урологии и расходные материалы от ведущих мировых производителей. Урологические лазеры для литотрипсии и хирургии.

Visit uro.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Uro.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 483 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

uro.ru performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.244

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

uro.ru

483 ms

uro.ru

864 ms

style.css

151 ms

simple-adaptive-slider.min.css

289 ms

scripts.js

702 ms

Our browser made a total of 156 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (122 requests) were addressed to the original Uro.ru, 6% (9 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Leadback.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Uro.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (22%)

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Uro.ru main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 317.5 kB

  • Original 398.6 kB
  • After minification 371.0 kB
  • After compression 81.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 317.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 815.9 kB

  • Original 4.4 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Uro needs image optimization as it can save up to 815.9 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 70.1 kB

  • Original 592.7 kB
  • After minification 592.7 kB
  • After compression 522.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

  • Original 234.6 kB
  • After minification 234.6 kB
  • After compression 184.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uro.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (19%)

Requests Now

151

After Optimization

123

The browser has sent 151 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Uro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

uro.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

uro.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

uro.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uro.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Uro.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Uro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: