6.8 sec in total
466 ms
4.7 sec
1.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Viva Media content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivamedia.com
Viva är marknadsföringsbyrån som har kapaciteten att axla hela er marknadsföring, eller delar av den om ni vill. Läs mer om oss!
Visit vivamedia.comWe analyzed Vivamedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
vivamedia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value31,360 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value43.1 s
0/100
10%
466 ms
840 ms
46 ms
521 ms
544 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vivamedia.com, 72% (28 requests) were made to Vivamedia.se and 10% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Vivamedia.se.
Page size can be reduced by 269.9 kB (45%)
603.0 kB
333.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Vivamedia.com main page is 603.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 199.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Viva Media images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 90.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivamedia.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (85%)
33
5
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viva Media. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vivamedia.com
466 ms
vivamedia.se
840 ms
uc.js
46 ms
style.min.css
521 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
544 ms
font-awesome.min.css
527 ms
style.min.css
518 ms
css2
448 ms
jquery.mmenu.all.css
448 ms
style.css
614 ms
jquery.min.js
611 ms
load-more-posts.js
1552 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
1617 ms
splc-script.min.js
1616 ms
mmenu.min.js
454 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
452 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
450 ms
packery-mode.js
1615 ms
main.js
1634 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1709 ms
mailcheck.min.js
1808 ms
punycode.min.js
1906 ms
wpforms.min.js
1907 ms
api.js
432 ms
cc.js
263 ms
loggo.svg
1662 ms
Puff-1-1000x500.jpg
1798 ms
Puff-2-2-500x500.jpg
1875 ms
Viva-Media-%E2%80%93-Vivas-V%C3%A4rld-Puff-500x500.jpg
1836 ms
Puff-4-500x500.jpg
2038 ms
Puff-5-500x500.jpg
2038 ms
Puff-6-500x500.jpg
2055 ms
Puff-7-1000x500.jpg
2226 ms
submit-spin.svg
2130 ms
bc-v4.min.html
656 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1737 ms
fa-light-300.woff
2152 ms
,
494 ms
jquery.min.js
201 ms
vivamedia.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vivamedia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
vivamedia.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
SV
SV
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivamedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivamedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vivamedia.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Viva Media. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: