Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

wallpapertop.xyz

HUBUNGI KAMI LANGSUNG

Page Load Speed

896 ms in total

First Response

289 ms

Resources Loaded

521 ms

Page Rendered

86 ms

wallpapertop.xyz screenshot

About Website

Visit wallpapertop.xyz now to see the best up-to-date Wallpapertop content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wallpapertop.xyz

Visit wallpapertop.xyz

Key Findings

We analyzed Wallpapertop.xyz page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 607 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wallpapertop.xyz performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wallpapertop.xyz

289 ms

caf.js

39 ms

glp

209 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Wallpapertop.xyz, 33% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (289 ms) belongs to the original domain Wallpapertop.xyz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.9 kB (27%)

Content Size

80.9 kB

After Optimization

59.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Wallpapertop.xyz main page is 80.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 61.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 61.8 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wallpapertop. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

wallpapertop.xyz accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

wallpapertop.xyz best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wallpapertop.xyz SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wallpapertop.xyz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wallpapertop.xyz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wallpapertop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: