6.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.8 sec
56 ms
Visit wordup.co.za now to see the best up-to-date Wordup content for South Africa and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wordup.co.za
Visit wordup.co.zaWe analyzed Wordup.co.za page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
wordup.co.za performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
1088 ms
1451 ms
28 ms
715 ms
1426 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Wordup.co.za, 16% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Wordup.co.za.
Page size can be reduced by 26.8 kB (10%)
277.6 kB
250.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Wordup.co.za main page is 277.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 135.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wordup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordup.co.za has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (52%)
21
10
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wordup.co.za
1088 ms
wordup.co.za
1451 ms
css2
28 ms
all.min.css
715 ms
bootstrap-icons.css
1426 ms
dropzone.css
1070 ms
glightbox.min.css
1074 ms
choices.min.css
1074 ms
flatpickr.min.css
1082 ms
style.css
1818 ms
logo.svg
1430 ms
1431 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
1432 ms
dropzone.js
2170 ms
choices.min.js
1782 ms
glightbox.min.js
2146 ms
flatpickr.min.js
2146 ms
functions.js
1792 ms
03.jpg
2141 ms
01.jpg
2153 ms
02.jpg
2195 ms
04.jpg
2506 ms
05.jpg
2510 ms
06.jpg
2506 ms
07.jpg
2513 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff
21 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff
29 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff
37 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff
43 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff
35 ms
bootstrap-icons.woff
1401 ms
wordup.co.za accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wordup.co.za best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wordup.co.za SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordup.co.za can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Wordup.co.za main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wordup.co.za
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: