Access resourceva.com. Roofing Virginia Beach | Virginia Beach Roofing Contractor

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

resourceva.com

16 ms

qualityroofingvirginiabeach.com

121 ms

style.min.css

35 ms

style.css

39 ms

ddb976070dc17fde6e27e885d20bca0d.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Resourceva.com, 91% (29 requests) were made to Qualityroofingvirginiabeach.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (143 ms) relates to the external source Qualityroofingvirginiabeach.com.

Content Size

308.5 kB

After Optimization

254.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Resourceva.com main page is 308.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 166.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 53.5 kB

Original 70.8 kB
After minification 69.1 kB
After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6 B

Original 166.5 kB
After minification 166.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resourceva images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 197 B

Original 17.5 kB
After minification 17.5 kB
After compression 17.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 305 B

Original 53.8 kB
After minification 53.8 kB
After compression 53.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resourceva.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resourceva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.