Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

capetown.wordcamp.org

WordCamp Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

84 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cape Town Word Camp content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about capetown.wordcamp.org

Just another WordCamp

Visit capetown.wordcamp.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Capetown.wordcamp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

capetown.wordcamp.org performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

2016.capetown.wordcamp.org

3010 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

73 ms

css

64 ms

genericons.css

215 ms

style.css

220 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Capetown.wordcamp.org, 17% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source 2016.capetown.wordcamp.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 302.1 kB (68%)

Content Size

445.7 kB

After Optimization

143.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Capetown.wordcamp.org main page is 445.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 222.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 12.5 kB
  • After minification 12.0 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 140.8 kB

  • Original 210.4 kB
  • After minification 204.8 kB
  • After compression 69.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 152.6 kB

  • Original 222.8 kB
  • After minification 205.2 kB
  • After compression 70.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Capetown.wordcamp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (87%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cape Town Word Camp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

capetown.wordcamp.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

capetown.wordcamp.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

capetown.wordcamp.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Capetown.wordcamp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Capetown.wordcamp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cape Town Word Camp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: