11.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
9.1 sec
343 ms
Click here to check amazing Backlight content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about backlight.mu
Looking for creative Photography and Video services in Mauritius? Look no further! Our team of experienced artists offer a wide range of services to cover your needs including weddings, holiday, honey...
Visit backlight.muWe analyzed Backlight.mu page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
backlight.mu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value18.8 s
0/100
25%
Value22.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,910 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value38.8 s
0/100
10%
1645 ms
84 ms
137 ms
144 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Backlight.mu, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Backlight.mu.
Page size can be reduced by 800.0 kB (38%)
2.1 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Backlight.mu main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Backlight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 545.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 545.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 148.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Backlight.mu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (48%)
96
50
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Backlight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.backlight.mu
1645 ms
style.css
84 ms
settings.css
137 ms
social_widget.css
144 ms
html5reset.css
135 ms
style.css
140 ms
skin.css
133 ms
wp.css
149 ms
shortcodes.css
210 ms
media.css
226 ms
home.css
227 ms
home-media.css
227 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
231 ms
highslide.css
227 ms
custom.css
273 ms
supersized.css
299 ms
supersized.shutter.css
325 ms
jquery.js
445 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
345 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
437 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
400 ms
cufon-yui.js
363 ms
1432125209_custom_cufon.js
396 ms
load-cufon.js
416 ms
swfobject.js
429 ms
tumblog_frontend_styles.css
485 ms
comment-reply.min.js
488 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
488 ms
jquery.wipetouch.js
518 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
498 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
507 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
532 ms
highslide-full.js
594 ms
highslide.config.js
548 ms
highslide.mobile.js
565 ms
jquery.transit.js
574 ms
supersized.3.2.7.js
605 ms
ga.js
24 ms
supersized.shutter.js
537 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
500 ms
scripts.js
516 ms
wp-embed.min.js
516 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
582 ms
facebook.png
229 ms
twitter.png
230 ms
instagram.png
253 ms
pinterest.png
255 ms
googleplus.png
254 ms
youtube.png
255 ms
flickr.png
282 ms
myspace.png
275 ms
tumblr.png
331 ms
1437141932_mobile_logo.jpeg
322 ms
thumb.php
592 ms
ddmenu_bg.png
522 ms
ddmenu_b.png
400 ms
aside_t.png
376 ms
aside_bg.png
402 ms
logo_bg.png
399 ms
mm_spread.png
443 ms
aside_b.png
498 ms
back.png
5555 ms
forward.png
4672 ms
bg-black.png
514 ms
progress-back.png
567 ms
progress-bar.png
581 ms
bottom_bg.png
563 ms
play.png
667 ms
button-tray.png
649 ms
go_up.png
626 ms
thumb.php
935 ms
thumb.php
1033 ms
thumb.php
1021 ms
thumb.php
1058 ms
thumb.php
1792 ms
thumb.php
1944 ms
thumb.php
1943 ms
thumb.php
1839 ms
thumb.php
2914 ms
thumb.php
2704 ms
thumb.php
3177 ms
thumb.php
3133 ms
thumb.php
3694 ms
thumb.php
3691 ms
thumb.php
3860 ms
thumb.php
3713 ms
thumb.php
4154 ms
thumb.php
4085 ms
thumb.php
4134 ms
324787_339237189442678_1675115692_o1.jpg
4159 ms
slide11.jpg
4583 ms
slide5.jpg
4412 ms
progress.gif
4172 ms
li-bg.png
140 ms
pause.png
132 ms
custom.png
108 ms
zoomout.cur
101 ms
ajax-loader.gif
105 ms
backlight.mu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
backlight.mu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
backlight.mu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Backlight.mu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Backlight.mu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
backlight.mu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Backlight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: