2.5 sec in total
144 ms
1.9 sec
528 ms
Visit groupcoverage.net now to see the best up-to-date Group Coverage content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about groupcoverage.net
1-877-GROUP-11 - Group Coverage, Inc. provides value based insurance and employee benefits to organizations, individuals and professional agents & brokers in NY, NJ, and CT.
Visit groupcoverage.netWe analyzed Groupcoverage.net page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
groupcoverage.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value7,100 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
144 ms
362 ms
184 ms
251 ms
250 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Groupcoverage.net, 7% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 337.8 kB (26%)
1.3 MB
949.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Groupcoverage.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 844.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Group Coverage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 161.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.6 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Groupcoverage.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (38%)
87
54
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Group Coverage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
groupcoverage.net
144 ms
groupcoverage.net
362 ms
wpstyles.css
184 ms
nav_resourcesstyle.css
251 ms
nav_1style.css
250 ms
jquery.js
328 ms
jquery.wputils.js
194 ms
jsNavBarFuncs.js
257 ms
wp_navbar_textmenu.js
255 ms
nav_resourcestree.js
256 ms
wp_navbar_menu.js
255 ms
nav_1tree.js
252 ms
jquery.wplightbox.js
319 ms
jquery.event.move.js
314 ms
jquery.event.swipe.js
312 ms
jquery.wpslider.js
319 ms
widgets.js
122 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
wp4e5c2d14_1a.png
191 ms
wpc2536d91_1a.png
189 ms
wp59a82b3a_1a.png
190 ms
wp411157b7_1a.png
188 ms
wp4574a019_1a.png
189 ms
wpf15a3815_1a.png
187 ms
wp220ba326_1a.png
194 ms
wp9f7560f4_1a.png
194 ms
wp2094a2e6_1a.png
194 ms
wp2db5cac9_1a.png
192 ms
wpddd38efb_1a.png
194 ms
wp10fbd999_1a.png
193 ms
wp44b55e7c_1a.png
320 ms
wpca77dd45_1a.png
317 ms
wpe80f6e18_1a.png
317 ms
wp7063ad40_1a.png
321 ms
wp9aa59e65_1a.png
321 ms
wp0b363184_1a.png
320 ms
wp2a8ce50b_1a.png
354 ms
wpebe7b570_1a.png
353 ms
wpc4291e3b_1a.png
353 ms
wp1f69ad22_1a.png
352 ms
wp531e4860_1a.png
355 ms
wp0a5643b1_1a.png
353 ms
wp416a6843_1a.png
453 ms
wp95287844_05_1a.jpg
470 ms
wpc9a17646_1a.png
452 ms
wp5d993439_1a.png
532 ms
wpd24c909f_05_1a.jpg
470 ms
wp84ba8e15_05_1a.jpg
470 ms
wp6a18e6fb_05_1a.jpg
468 ms
wp383776d4_05_1a.jpg
475 ms
wp0e3f2232_05_1a.jpg
547 ms
wp0444a86f_05_1a.jpg
545 ms
wp0cbe50fb_1a.png
539 ms
wp8c588321_1a.png
516 ms
like.php
286 ms
plusone.js
96 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
158 ms
collect
21 ms
wp873ed3bb_1a.png
370 ms
wpa8c46564_1a.png
419 ms
wp841a7a35_1a.png
420 ms
wp438dd8b9_1a.png
420 ms
wpacf796c1_1a.png
423 ms
control.php
53 ms
wp86ee73d8_1a.png
422 ms
wp11acf4b5_1a.png
419 ms
wp08688be7_1a.png
453 ms
wp8fbbb896_05_1a.jpg
462 ms
wpbcfde3db_1a.png
463 ms
wpc980d304_1a.png
477 ms
wp3fb30b84_1a.png
469 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
17 ms
fastbutton
83 ms
postmessageRelay
176 ms
settings
183 ms
wp6a402d21_1a.png
352 ms
wp9b7d89c0_1a.png
383 ms
wp67bb11e3_1a.png
392 ms
wpc041616a_1a.png
392 ms
wpa7c5de6c_1a.png
399 ms
blxue7LW05k.js
47 ms
wp5d3a93c7_1a.png
391 ms
FEppCFCt76d.png
119 ms
developers.google.com
612 ms
1832714284-postmessagerelay.js
53 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
32 ms
button.d2f864f87f544dc0c11d7d712a191c1f.js
34 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
embeds
50 ms
follow_button.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.en.html
46 ms
info.json
143 ms
groupcoverage.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
groupcoverage.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
groupcoverage.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Groupcoverage.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Groupcoverage.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
groupcoverage.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Group Coverage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: