1 sec in total
9 ms
600 ms
396 ms
Visit n4stack.io now to see the best up-to-date N 4 Stack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about n4stack.io
N4Stack - Microsoft Azure & AWS consulting partners with Data and DevOps practices, adding value to your cloud transformation project.
Visit n4stack.ioWe analyzed N4stack.io page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 996 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
n4stack.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value560 ms
52/100
30%
Value1.174
1/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
9 ms
22 ms
49 ms
19 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original N4stack.io, 45% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (464 ms) belongs to the original domain N4stack.io.
Page size can be reduced by 202.1 kB (29%)
705.5 kB
503.3 kB
In fact, the total size of N4stack.io main page is 705.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 406.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, N 4 Stack needs image optimization as it can save up to 134.2 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (47%)
32
17
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of N 4 Stack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
n4stack.io
9 ms
n4stack.io
22 ms
css
49 ms
autoptimize_b1f501322d26853a36108fc1576d0b96.css
19 ms
font-awesome.min.css
47 ms
icon
66 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
js
115 ms
autoptimize_single_4dd581c1704788cdefa607cca663b9b1.js
20 ms
251767.js
114 ms
autoptimize_15c09b342ed7576dad71f4b05c441171.js
32 ms
autoptimize_bc8629efe49ab872bcfa13521baee131.css
43 ms
N4Stack-White-2.png
26 ms
preloader.gif
30 ms
Service-Tile-Stack-211x300.png
30 ms
N4Stack_People.png
30 ms
Database-Experts.png
28 ms
N4Stack-Icon.png
30 ms
DBA-DevOps.png
53 ms
N4Stack-Agile-Development.png
52 ms
N4Stack-Security.png
52 ms
CAF-Diagram.png
464 ms
Ignition.png
52 ms
Governance-MVP.png
52 ms
Landing-zone.png
75 ms
Innovate.png
75 ms
N4Stack-White-2-300x62.png
75 ms
leadflows.js
84 ms
banner.js
223 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
194 ms
fb.js
67 ms
conversations-embed.js
73 ms
251767.js
105 ms
collectedforms.js
105 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff
49 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
54 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff
90 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff
69 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf
69 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
84 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
84 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff
229 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
84 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff
86 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff
193 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff
87 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf
86 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff
87 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
108 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
107 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
108 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff
108 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
109 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff
110 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
110 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
109 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
109 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff
109 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf
110 ms
modules.ttf
19 ms
AkzidenzGrotesk-BQ-Light-Regular.otf
80 ms
n4stack.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
n4stack.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
n4stack.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise N4stack.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that N4stack.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
n4stack.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of N 4 Stack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: