Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rapidproxy.org

rapidproxy.org

Page Load Speed

46.5 sec in total

First Response

685 ms

Resources Loaded

40.5 sec

Page Rendered

5.3 sec

rapidproxy.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rapidproxy content for South Korea. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rapidproxy.org

This domain may be for sale!

Visit rapidproxy.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rapidproxy.org page load time and found that the first response time was 685 ms and then it took 45.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rapidproxy.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rapidproxy.org

685 ms

style.css

386 ms

adsbygoogle.js

248 ms

show_ads.js

167 ms

addthis_widget.js

391 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Rapidproxy.org, 10% (9 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 10% (9 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.3 sec) relates to the external source Bs.serving-sys.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (66%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

781.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Rapidproxy.org main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 112.7 kB

  • Original 144.1 kB
  • After minification 143.0 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rapidproxy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 701.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 3.5 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rapidproxy.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (68%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rapidproxy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rapidproxy.org accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rapidproxy.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rapidproxy.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rapidproxy.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rapidproxy.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rapidproxy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: